In a shocking revelation during a Senate hearing in Australia, a Pfizer spokesperson revealed that the pharmaceutical giant had imported a special batch of COVID-19 vaccines solely for their employee vaccination program.<\/p>\n
The admission came during a rigorous questioning session on Wednesday, in which Pfizer Australia\u2019s Country Medical Director, Dr. Krishan Thiru, and Head of Regulatory Sciences, Dr. Brian Hewitt, spoke before the Australian Senate\u2019s \u2018Education and Employment Legislation Committee\u2019 about the experimental COVID-19 vaccines.<\/p>\n
Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts led the interrogation with forceful inquiries regarding Pfizer\u2019s potential involvement in the introduction of vaccine mandates for employment in Australia.<\/p>\n
Senator Roberts, in his questioning, alleged a significant transfer of wealth from the Australian people to Big Pharma via the government\u2019s Covid-19 mismanagement.<\/p>\n
He sought clarity on Pfizer\u2019s role in implementing vaccine mandates for employment and their participation in potential government bans on alternative treatments such as Ivermectin.<\/p>\n
\u201cPfizer has no involvement, had no involvement in the imposition of vaccine mandates\u2026 Pfizer has had no involvement in relation to Ivermectin,\u201d said Dr. Thiru.<\/p>\n
The inquiry took a contentious turn when Roberts probed into Pfizer\u2019s confidential indemnity agreements with the Australian government, suggesting that the taxpayers who funded the vaccine have the right to see the details of what they bought.<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes the indemnity you have with the government extend to providing you with indemnity in the situation where an employee is forced by their employer to undergo vaccination and then experiences harm? And if you do have indemnity, I want the proof,\u201d Roberts asked.<\/p>\n
Dr. Thiru maintained that the specifics of these agreements remain confidential, per standard practice for contractual arrangements between the government and private organizations.<\/p>\n
\u201cSenator, any indemnity agreements between Pfizer and the Australian government are confidential and we are not able to discuss that in this forum,\u201d said Thiru.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy are they confidential? Because as a taxpayer, I paid for those injections even though I didn\u2019t take any. Why are they confidential? From taxpayers, 26 million Australians. What are you hiding?\u201d Roberts asked.<\/p>\n
Roberts also queried about Pfizer\u2019s own employee vaccination program, which Dr. Thiru confirmed was active and conducted in alignment with public health guidance, allowing accommodations or exemptions for those with specific medical or religious reasons for not being vaccinated. He did, however, acknowledge that a small number of colleagues departed the company in light of this program.<\/p>\n
Roberts then questioned Pfizer\u2019s use of a specific batch of vaccine for their employees that was not tested by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), to which Dr. Hewitt CLAIMED that this was done to ensure that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019ve read that your vaccine mandate was using your own batch of vaccine, especially imported for Pfizer, which was not tested by the TGA. Is that correct?\u201d Roberts asked.<\/p>\n
Dr. Hewitt then responded, \u201cSo Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccine specifically for the employee vaccination programme, and that was so that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks that was being delivered to clinics as needed.\u201d<\/p>\n
BOMBSHELL: Pfizer employees were given a *special batch*\u2026 different from what was forced into the general population pic.twitter.com\/CDww6wxFif<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Pelham (@Resist_05) August 4, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n\n Roberts then asked, \u201cDoes your contract with the government for supply of COVID injections include a clause that negates your indemnity in the event of Pfizer committing a crime such as fraudulent treatment of trial data? The question is simple. What is the answer? Yes or no?\u201d<\/p>\n Dr. Thiru was unable to provide a definitive response when questioned about whether Pfizer\u2019s contract with the Australian government included clauses that would nullify their indemnity in the event of \u201cfraudulent treatment of trial data.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cSenator Roberts, as I had mentioned previously, the contents of Pfizer\u2019s contract with the Australian government remains confidential, and I don\u2019t have any information that I can provide to the Committee in relation to that,\u201d Thiru said.<\/p>\n Roberts\u2019 suspicion extended to the origins of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, questioning whether it was initially developed as a countermeasure for the American Department of Defence. Dr. Thiru responded, emphasizing the vaccine\u2019s development was solely aimed at combating the global public health emergency resulting from the pandemic.<\/p>\n In a Twitter post, Roberts wrote<\/a>:<\/p>\n Watch as I question Pfizer representatives last night in a Senate Hearing.<\/p>\n The company was very reluctant to attend the committee hearing and also reluctant to supply a straight answer, automatically falling back on their \u2018safe and effective\u2019 mantra to dodge answering the question.<\/p>\n Already, this Senate Hearing revealed that Pfizer is rewriting history on transmission of infection. We\u2019re supposed to conveniently forget they said \u201cget it to protect others, to save grandma\u201d and \u201cwhen you\u2019re vaccinated the virus stops with you\u201d.<\/p>\n They\u2019re hiding behind their indemnity contract with our government and dodging responsibility.<\/p>\n ATAGI and the Australian governments must stop pushing these unsafe and ineffective shots and drop the destructive mandates now.<\/p>\n The post BOMBSHELL: Spokesperson Admits During Australian Senate Hearing that Pfizer Employees Were Given Special Batch of Vaccine, Different from What was Distributed to Public (VIDEO)<\/a> appeared first on The Gateway Pundit<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In a shocking revelation during a Senate hearing in Australia, a Pfizer spokesperson revealed that the pharmaceutical giant<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nWATCH:<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n