Judge Aileen Cannon on Tuesday smacked down Special Counsel Jack Smith and denied his request to bar Trump from criticizing law enforcement after it was revealed Biden\u2019s DOJ authorized the use of deadly force during the Mar-a-Lago raid.<\/p>\n
Jack Smith late Friday night sought a gag\u00a0order<\/a>\u00a0barring Trump from criticizing Biden\u2019s rogue DOJ\/FBI.<\/p>\n The names of the armed FBI agents involved in the Mar-a-Lago raid were redacted but Jack Smith tried to illegally gag Trump anyway.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Government moves to modify defendant Donald J. Trump\u2019s conditions of release, to make clear that he may not make statements that pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents participating in the investigation and prosecution of this case.,\u201d Jack Smith wrote in a motion filed Friday evening.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Government\u2019s request is necessary because of several intentionally false and inflammatory statements recently made by Trump that distort the circumstances under which the Federal Bureau of Investigation planned and executed the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago,\u201d Smith wrote.<\/p>\n AP reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n The judge overseeing Donald Trump\u2019s classified documents case in Florida on Tuesday denied prosecutors\u2019 request to bar the former president from making public statements that could endanger law enforcement agents participating in the prosecution.<\/p>\n U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon said in her order that prosecutors didn\u2019t give defense lawyers adequate time to discuss the request before it was filed Friday evening. She denied the request without prejudice, meaning prosecutors could file it again.<\/p>\n Cannon warned sanctions could be next Jack Smith\u2019s prosecutors keep violating the rules.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Judge Cannon, as expected, denies Jack Smith’s proposed gag order, warns sanctions could be next if he keeps violating the rules. pic.twitter.com\/T2Yxb1zvm6<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) May 28, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n\n Judge Aileen Cannon on Tuesday unsealed numerous motions related to Jack Smith\u2019s classified documents case against Trump.<\/p>\n One filing revealed Biden\u2019s FBI authorized the use of deadly force during their raid on Mar-a-Lago authorized by US Attorney General Merrick Garland in August 2022.<\/p>\n Armed FBI agents were prepared to confront Trump!!<\/p>\n \u201cShould FPOTUS [Trump] arrive at MAL [Mar-a-Lago], FBI MM EM and OSCs will be prepared to engage with FPOTUS and USSS Security Team.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cShould USSS provide resistance or interfere with FBI timeline or accesses, FBI MM EM will engage with [redacted] and [redacted] will engage with USSS POC\u2019s per existing liaison relationships.\u201d<\/p>\n The FBI had a medic on the scene and identified a local trauma center for anyone \u201cinjured\u201d during the FBI raid.<\/p>\n \u201cLaw enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person,\u201d the document on the use of deadly force read.<\/p>\n\n Joe Biden\u2019s FBI justified<\/a> its authorization of the use of deadly force during their Mar-a-Lago raid because of \u201clife-threatening\u201d contraband in the kitchen and gym.<\/p>\n \u201cWithout no basis whatsoever, in the affidavit or otherwise, FBI agents searched the private bedrooms of the First Lady and President Trump\u2019s youngest son. See Walter v. United States, 447 U.S. 649, 657 (1980) (\u201c[A] warrant to search for a stolen refrigerator would not authorize the opening of desk drawers.\u201d). The FBI\u2019s photo log demonstrates that the agents took extensive photographs of those rooms\u201442 and 27, respectively\u2014for no apparent reason. See Ex. 5 at USA01285293-300. There was no factual basis for the agents to rummage through rooms not specified in the warrant and, not surprisingly, they seized nothing from these other rooms,\u201d according to Trump\u2019s motion for relief relating to the Mar-a-Lago raid and unlawful piercing of attorney-client privilege.<\/p>\n \u201cNor was there any basis for the FBI to bring firearms into Mar-a-Lago. There were no threats and no risk to agents\u2019 safety arising from their allegations relating to possession of documents at a premises already guarded by the Secret Service. But the agents appear to have done so, based on documents produced in discovery, in order to search for alleged contraband they pretended was life threatening in Mar-a-Lago\u2019s gym and kitchen (five and four pictures, respectively),\u201d the motion read.<\/p>\n The post BREAKING: Judge Cannon Denies Jack Smith\u2019s Request to Bar Trump From Criticizing Law Enforcement Over Deadly Force Policy in Mar-a-Lago Raid, Warns Sanctions Could be Next!<\/a> appeared first on The Gateway Pundit<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Judge Aileen Cannon on Tuesday smacked down Special Counsel Jack Smith and denied his request to bar Trump<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29821","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n