Georgia State Election Board hearing 9\/20\/2024<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
In a big win today, the Georgia State Election Board passed Resolution 181-1-12-.12 by a 3-2 count.\u00a0 The resolution simply requires the hand counting of physical paper ballots at the precinct level to ensure it matches the total reported by the tabulators.\u00a0 This does not involve a hand-count tabulation of the vote totals but rather simply the total number of physical ballots cast at that particular precinct.<\/p>\n
This is a welcome rule in Georgia after several issues arose during a municipal election in Tennessee in 2021.\u00a0 There is ample evidence that the same issues discovered in Tennessee may have plagued the Georgia 2020 General Election.\u00a0 The Gateway Pundit has previously reported<\/a> on this situation.<\/p>\n GREAT NEWS!<\/p>\n GA State Election Board passes 3-2 resolution 181-1-12-.12<\/p>\n HAND COUNT at precinct level to ensure the totals match with the machines<\/p>\n This is a HUGE win and was opposed by the Fake News, the Left, and Raffensperger pic.twitter.com\/12FxvV9Tf4<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) September 20, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n\n Following the 2020 General Election, Williamson County, TN reported an anomaly in their vote tabulation to EAC via the Tennessee Secretary of State\u2019s Office.\u00a0 The anomaly was discovered when an election worker counted the physical paper ballots from their October 2021 municipal election and realized that the number of ballots hand-counted did not match the number of ballots scanned on 7 out of 18 tabulators.<\/p>\n This led to an investigation by the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission (EAC) that could not conclusively pinpoint the direct cause of the anomaly.\u00a0 The\u00a0 EAC, in conjunction with Dominion Voting, investigated and, in February 2022, Dominion submitted a \u201cRoot Cause Analaysis\u201d to the EAC.<\/span><\/p>\n The EAC\u2019s final report noted that \u201cerroneous code is present in the EAC certified D-Suite 5.5-B and\u20265.5-C systems.\u201d<\/p>\n From the report<\/a>:<\/p>\n On February 11, 2022, Dominion submitted a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to the EAC. The report During the testing and analysis, it was discovered that \u201caudit log information revealed entries that coincided with the manifestation of the anomaly; a security error \u201cQR code signature mismatch\u201d<\/strong> and a warning message \u201cBallot format or id is unrecognizable\u201d<\/strong> indicating that a QR code misread occurred.\u201d<\/p>\n This caused the ballot to be \u201crejected.\u201d\u00a0 The EAC states in their report:<\/p>\n Further analysis of the anomaly behavior showed that the scanners correctly tabulated all ballots until the anomaly was triggered. Following the anomaly, ballots successfully scanned and tabulated by the ICP were not<\/strong> reflected in the close poll reports on the affected ICP scanners.<\/p>\n When the anomaly was triggered on the seven tabulators in Williamson County, TN, it did not reflect the proper vote count in the close poll tapes compared to the actual physical count.<\/p>\n The same \u201cQR code signature mismatch\u201d and \u201cballot format or id is unrecognizable\u201d error code was also found in 64 out of 66 counties in Georgia<\/strong>, using the same tabulators as Williamson County.<\/p>\n\n GABallots.com uncovered these anomalies in 97% of Georgia Counties they examined system log files for. https:\/\/gaballots.com\/evidence\/f\/scanner-failures-in-georgia-match-the-williamson-error<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Additionally, several counties in Georgia discovered additional ballots<\/a> that were not reflected in the original tabulation during their November 16th hand recount.\u00a0 Douglas County found 293 ballots.\u00a0 Fayette County found 2,755 ballots.\u00a0 Floyd County found 2,600 ballots and Walton County found 284 ballots.\u00a0 Some of the counties attributed it to a \u201cfound\u201d memory card.\u00a0 Journalist Heather Mullins was on the ground in Floyd County and pressed election officials on what the cause was.\u00a0 They acknowledged it was likely not a missing memory card.<\/p>\n Floyd County, GA: After a FULL day of rescanning, counting, & software techs troubleshooting, election officials (while VERY transparent), still had NO answer as to what caused 2700 votes to go uncounted. Dominion techs said they could not comment. Listen to this! @RealAmVoice<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/v6j9lMatXH<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Heather Mullins (@TalkMullins) November 18, 2020<\/a><\/p>\n\n Here are two witnesses\/experts that testified about the Rule today at the Georgia State Election Board hearing:<\/p>\n\n \u00a0<\/p>\n\n The post HUGE! Georgia State Election Board Passes Rule Requiring Hand-Count of Ballots at Precinct Level<\/a> appeared first on The Gateway Pundit<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Georgia State Election Board hearing 9\/20\/2024 \u00a0 In a big win today, the Georgia State Election Board passed<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35282","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n
\nindicates that erroneous code is present<\/strong> in the EAC certified D-Suite 5.5-B and D-Suite 5.5-C
\nsystems. The RCA report states that when the anomaly occurs, it\u2019s due to a misread of the QR
\ncode. If the QR code misread affects a certain part of the QR code, the ICP scanner mistakenly
\ninterprets a bit in the code that marks the ballot as provisional. Once that misread happens, the
\nprovisional flag is not properly reset after that ballot\u2019s voting session. The result is that every
\nballot scanned and tabulated by the machine after that misread is marked as provisional and
\nthus, not included in the tabulator\u2019s close poll report totals.<\/p>\n