Now that counting has finally been completed in lawless California, where elections no longer take place, a mad dash of ballot harvesting and illegal voters determines elections in the Golden State today.
Republicans lost their final seat when Derek Tran ousted Michelle Steel after three weeks of counting and collecting suspect ballots in Orange County. Tran was declared the winner the day before Thanksgiving.
Leftist CNN’s Harry Enten, a senior data analyst, sounded the alarm on the historically slim GOP majority, pointing out that if current projections hold, the Republican advantage could be the smallest in nearly a century.
As it stands, Republicans are projected to hold just 220 seats compared to the Democrats’ 215. This razor-thin margin leaves little room for error, particularly as President Trump has announced nominations for three key Republican members—Elise Stefanik, Matt Gaetz, and Mike Waltz—to join his administration.
With their departure, the GOP majority would shrink to a mere 217 seats. That means Republicans will hold only a two-seat advantage when Congress convenes in January.
They cannot afford to lose ONE VOTE to Democrats!
Harry Enten: My goodness gracious. Yes, the Republicans are going to control the House of Representatives. But if all the current results hold up, we’re looking at a record-small majority after the Novembers in the last 90 years.
You have to go all the way back to the Herbert Hoover administration to find an even smaller majority after the November elections.
We’re talking about the Republicans with 220 seats and the Democrats with 215 if the current House results hold. Keep in mind that this will drop lower if Stefanik, Waltz, or others like Matt Gaetz leave Congress.
CNN reporter: Talk to me. This is the best-case scenario for Republicans, at least for the next few weeks or months. Where could it go?
Harry Enten: Where could it go? It could shrink even further. Let’s say Gaetz, Stefanik, and Waltz resigned. We could be looking at—get this—Republicans at 217, the Democrats at 215, and I went all the way back. Look, this is crazy. This is crazy, right? Because all it means is Democrats at 215 plus one GOP seat could tank the entire thing because then both sides would be at 216 seats, John…
…You might have noticed in my last answer, I was so excited I nearly got ahead of myself. How historically unprecedented it is. I love history. Sometimes just one majority member could sink a bill by voting with the minority in the last 100 years plus. This, possibly 2025, with the likely resignations from the House. And that’s it. It’s literally the only time in the last 100 years, assuming, of course, all members vote.
So the bottom line is, look, the results from the November elections weren’t exactly good for Democrats, but this is a shining light for them. They really did hold the Republican majority down. And given the likely resignations that are coming, that House of Representatives for the Republicans—that House majority—is going to be record small.
This is why cheating matters. This is why Republicans must continue to battle election fraud. This could be disastrous for the Trump agenda.
Via Citizen Free Press and CNN:
REPUBLICANS HAVE SMALLEST HOUSE MAJORITY IN 90 YEARS
1) 220-215 will quickly be 217-215 with gaetz, stefanik, waltz.
2) If they lose 1 vote on any bill, it is 216-216 and the bill dies.pic.twitter.com/iIzHqQpNIX
— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) November 29, 2024
The post Republicans Face Narrowest House Majority in 90 Years, Thanks to California’s Ballot Harvesting, Etc.— If GOP Loses Just One Vote, Their Bill Will Die (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.